Area A. Eleven sites were documented, including an elliptical cistern (diam. c. 2.2 m; Site 1), cave openings (Sites 2, 6), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 3, 5, 7, 8; Fig. 2), building remains (watchman’s hut?; Site 4) and stone clearance heaps that are delimited by a wall (Sites 80–82; Fig. 3).
 
Area B. Five sites were documented on a low hill, including field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 9, 84, 87) and stone clearance heaps (Sites 83, 88).
 
Area C. Three sites were documented, including a field wall or farming terrace wall that was built of very large fieldstones (Site 12), a hewn pit (blocked today with stones; Site 14) and a stone clearance heap (diam. 8 m; Site 86).
 
Area D. Nine sites were documented, including field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 16, 22, 43, 72, 90), a curved wall and the remains of rock-cuttings in its eastern end (Site 18), a stone clearance heap surrounded by large fieldstones (diam. 6 m; Site 20), remains of a building (length 8 m; Site 42; Fig. 4) and a tomb (?; Site 91).
 
Area E. Sixteen sites were documented, including remains of a building (Site 45), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 47, 50, 53, 55–57, 59, 112), a rock-hewn pit and a cluster of cupmarks nearby (Site 54), stone clearance heaps (Sites 49, 60, 113), a rock-cutting (diam. 1 m; Site 108), curved wall (tower?; Site 58), and remains of a watchman’s hut (diam. 7 m; Site 111).
 
Area F. Twenty-one sites were documented, including a watchman’s hut (diam. 12 m; Site 64), stone clearance heaps (Sites 65, 70, 114, 117, 120, 184, 185), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 115, 116, 118, 121, 122, 177, 180–182; Fig. 5), building remains (Sites 128, 179), a rock-hewn installation in the shape of a half moon (Site 129) and a tomb (?; Site 178).
 
Area G. Eleven sites were documented, including a cupmark (diam. 0.1 m; Site 73), a tomb (?; 1.0 × 2.5 m; Site 74), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 94, 95, 97, 98, 103, 105, 106), a stone clearance heap (Site 99) and a curved wall (diam. 1.5 m; Site 100) with a nearby pile of stones.
 
Area H. Twelve sites were documented, including watchman’s huts (Sites 39, 41), field walls (Sites 36, 40, 135, 139), two hewn pits (diams. 0.4 and 0.8 m; Sites 38, 136), a scattering of potsherds dating to the Roman and Byzantine periods (Site 137) and stone clearance heaps (Sites 140–142).
 
Area I. The area was damaged in the past during the installation of various infrastructures. Six sites were documented, among them a cupmark (Site 35; Fig. 6), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 46, 172, 173), a watchman’s hut (diam. 3 m; Site 175) and a hewn installation (Site 176).
 
Area J. Five sites were documented, including field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 75, 76, 78, 79) and a curved wall built on a bedrock outcrop (Site 77).
 
Area K. The area was severely damaged by a modern quarry and by the paving of Highway 6. Three sites were documented within the precincts of the declared antiquities site Barqai, including a field wall and a nearby scattering of flint artifacts (Site 144) and two other scatterings of flint artifacts (Sites 145, 146).
 
Area L. Eleven sites were documented, including rock-hewn installations (Sites 129, 132; Fig. 7), a scattering of flint artifacts (Site 131), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 133, 134, 160, 163–165), a tomb (?; Site 159; Fig. 8) and a stone clearance heap delimited by fieldstones (diam. 9 m; Site 161).
 
Area M. The area was damaged in the past during the excavation of various infrastructures. Nine sites were documented, including building remains (Sites 128, 168), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 147, 150, 151, 166, 167; Fig. 9), a hewn opening that may be a cave entrance (width 0.8 m; Site 149) and a scattering of flint artifacts (Site 169).
 
Area N. Four sites were documented on a small hill within the precincts of the declared antiquities site Barqai, including farming terraces (Sites 156, 157), remains of a round building (diam. c. 9 m; Site 155) and a cupmark (diam. 0.2 m; Site 158).
 
Area O. The area was damaged in the past during the excavation of infrastructures. Two sites were documented, including a curved wall built of large fieldstones and a small scattering of flint artifacts nearby (Site 170) and a field wall (Site 171).
 
Area P. Five sites were documented within the precincts of the declared antiquities site Barqai, including stone clearance heaps (Sites 888, 889, 891), a small scattering of flint artifacts (Site 890) and a field wall (Site 892).
 
Area Q. Eight sites were documented within the precincts of the declared antiquities site Khirbat Nazur, including a square rock-cutting (length 1.4 m, depth 0.4 m; Site 205), a scattering of flint artifacts (Site 206), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 208, 209, 241), a stone clearance heap and a nearby stone-built wall (Site 210), two cave openings (Sites 201; Fig. 10) and a cupmark (diam. 6 cm; Site 240).
 
Area R. Part of the area was damaged during the preparation of paths. Thirteen sites were documented within the precincts of the declared antiquities site Tel Narbata, including stone clearance heaps delimited by walls (Sites 213, 216, 226, 242–244, 247, 248), field walls and farming terrace walls (Sites 214, 227, 245, 246) and building remains that may be a watchman’s hut (diam. 10 m; Site 217; Fig. 11).
 
The scatterings of flint artifacts were documented on a flat hilltop and along its northern slope, which faces a broad wadi channel (Sites 131, 144–146, 169, 170, 206, 890). The location of the flint scatterings hints at the possible presence of a prehistoric site on the hilltop. The artifacts include mostly industrial debitage composed of bladelets, bladelet fragments (Fig. 12:1–3), blade fragments and flakes. Fragments of trapezoidal/rectangular type geometric and non-geometric microliths were gathered (Fig. 12:4–7). The assemblage of flint artifacts dates the site to the Early or Intermediate Epi-Palaeolithic period, the Kebaran or Geometric Kebaran culture. The extremely meager ceramic finds in the survey were dated to the Roman and Byzantine periods.