Winepress I
A rock-hewn winepress (Figs. 3, 4) that consisted of an elongated shallow trapezoid treading floor with rounded corners (length 5.25 m, width 1.50–2.25 m, depth 0.25 m) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.58 × 1.20 m, depth 0.4 m). Two circular cupmarks (northern—diam. 0.3 m, depth 0.2 m; southern—diam. 0.26 m, depth 0.32 m) were hewn on either side of the treading floor, at a distance of 1.4 m from the bottom, closest to the collecting vat (Fig. 5). An additional depression (diam. 0.15 m, depth 0.07 m) was hewn in the center of the back third of the treading floor. Two channels (diam 0.16 m), partially hewn in the treading floor, drained the liquid out of the floor into the collecting vat. 
After the winepress went out of use, the treading floor was quarried for ashlar blocks. Part of a severance channel was observed. The winepress and quarry were devoid of finds.
 
Quarry/Winepress II
A quarry for ashlar blocks (Fig. 6). The quarrying was incomplete, as indicated by a roughly hewn stone block (0.37 × 0.90 m), surrounded by severance channels and clefts that was left in situ. The negative of another extracted stone was surrounded by a deep groove that served as a severance channel.
A sloping smoothed surface, c. 0.5 m north of the quarry, was probably the remnant of a winepress treading floor (Fig. 7). The quarry was devoid of finds.
 
Quarry III
A large quarry (length 9.5 m, width c. 5 m, depth c. 1.5 m; Fig. 8) in the northern part of the area was used for hewing ashlar stones. In addition to a rectangular ashlar block, a curvilinear quarried stone was left in place. The middle of the area was completely quarried and steps were hewn on the northern, southern and western margins (Fig. 9). The negatives of the extracted stones and a deep severance channel were partially visible. Trees from a protected forest could not be removed from the center of the quarry and precluded the completion of the excavation.
 
Quarry IV
 
 
Winepress V
A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of a short trapezoid treading floor with rounded corners (length 2.2 m, width 1.70–2.24 m, max. depth 0.5 m; Fig. 11) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.58 × 0.97 m, depth 0.35 m). The treading floor was relatively deeper than in most winepresses and notably, the collecting vat was not positioned at the central axis of the floor, but was justified to the northern corner (Fig. 12). A circular depression (diam. 0.15 m, depth 0.1 m) was hewn in the center of the treading floor and a small sump (diam. 0.24 m, depth 7 cm) was cut in the center of the collecting vat floor. Two channels (diam. 0.15 m), partially hewn in the treading floor, drained the liquid out of the floor into the collecting vat.
An open channel (width 0.6 m) was identified 0.75 m east of the winepress. It was not determined whether it was natural or a rock-hewn installation. The winepress and adjacent area were devoid of finds.
 
Winepress VI
A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of a small squarish and shallow treading floor with rounded corners (length 2 m, width 1.15 m, depth 0.2 m; Figs. 11, 13) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.63 × 0.97 m, depth 0.35 m). A circular depression (diam. 0.15 m, depth 5 cm) was hewn in the center of the treading floor and a small sump (diam. 0.19 m) was cut in the center of the collecting vat floor. Two channels (diam. 0.21 m), which drained the liquid from the treading floor into the collecting vat, were relatively wide, more circular and more vertically angled than those in the other excavated winepresses. The southern part of the winepress was damaged by modern agricultural activities. The winepress and adjacent area were devoid of finds.
 
Winepresses VII and VIII
These winepresses were not excavated during the current fieldwork; however, their location and preliminary measurements were documented. Winepress VII had a small treading floor (2.2 × 2.2 m) and a small collecting vat (0.65 × 1.00 m). Winepress VIII had a large elongated treading floor (length 7 m, width 2.6 m) and a collecting vat (0.80 × 1.35 m).  
 
Winepress IX
A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of a short trapezoid treading floor with rounded corners (length c. 2.5 m, width 1.90–2.24 m, depth 0.2 m; Figs. 14, 15) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.53 × 1.11 m, depth 0.3 m). A circular depression (diam. 0.2 m, depth 0.1 m) was hewn in the center of the treading floor and another small circular depression (diam. 0.24 m, depth 0.2 m) was cut north of the treading floor. Two channels that drained liquid from the treading floor into the collecting vat could not be clearly identified due to damage caused to bedrock. Two elongated depressions whose function is unknown were hewn to the northeast of the winepress. A similar depression was noted south of Winepress X (below).
Winepress IX was 2 m northeast of Winepress X. The bedrock area between them exhibited additional quarrying, including circular cupmarks, elongated depressions and smoothed bedrock. It is proposed that this area served the workers during the wine harvest and for various functions connected to the pressing of the wine grapes. It is also possible that some of these hewn depressions were the initial stages of hewing another winepress that was then abandoned.
 
Winepress X
A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of a shallow rectangular treading floor with rounded corners (length 2.4 m, width 1.8–2.0 m, depth 0.25 m; Fig. 16) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.58 × 1.14 m, depth 0.38 m). Two circular cupmarks (eastern—diam. 0.3 m, depth 0.25 m; western—diam. 0.24 m, depth 0.24 m) were hewn on either side of the treading floor at a distance of 1.0–1.2 m from the bottom of the treading floor, closest to the collecting vat. An additional depression (diam. 0.15 m, depth 7 cm) was hewn outside of the southwestern corner of the treading floor. Two channels (diam. 0.2 m), partially hewn in the treading floor, drained the must from the floor into the collecting vat. Another small circular sump (diam. 0.2 m, depth 8 cm) was cut in the corner of the collecting vat floor. The wall separating between the treading floor and the collecting vat was not well preserved. After the press went out of use this rocky outcrop was disturbed by forces of nature, e.g., the northwestern corner of the treading floor was damaged. 
 
Winepress XI
This winepress had an irregular shape. The almost rectangular treading floor (length 3.75 m, width 2.25 m; Figs. 17, 18) was similar to the treading floor of Winepresses IX and X; however, the rectangular collecting vat (0.60 × 1.15 m, depth 0.6 m)  was not aligned with the floor, but situated at the southeastern corner and was slightly damaged by modern agricultural activities. A small circular sump (diam. 0.2 m, depth 0.1 m) was cut in the corner of the collecting vat floor. A well-hewn deep circular depression (diam. 0.25 m, depth 0.37 m) in the center of the treading floor was aligned with another deep circular depression (diam. 0.27 m, depth 0.3 m) cut to the east of the treading floor. Two channels (diam. 0.15 m), which flanked the corner of the treading floor, due to the position of the collecting vat, drained the must from the treading floor into the collecting vat (Fig. 19).
This winepress is an interesting example of how the rock cutters adapted the basic characteristics of the Ta‘anakh winepress (below) to the available rocky outcrop.
 
Winepresses XII and XIII
Two well-preserved adjacent rock-hewn winepresses (Figs. 20, 21), which included each a shallow, trapezoid treading floor, a small rectangular collecting vat and various rock-hewn cupmarks. A tethering installation (diam. 0.25 m; Fig. 22) was hewn due north of Winepresses XII and XIII; its close proximity to the winepresses suggests a contemporaneous use.  
 
Winepress XII
 A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of a shallow rectangular treading floor with rounded corners (length 3.0–3.7m, width 1.93–2.30 m, depth 0.25 m). The back southern part of the floor had a steep slope and an irregular shape, which is probably the rock-cutters’ adaptation to bedrock. The small rectangular collecting vat (0.73 × 1.06 m, depth 0.35 m) had a circular sump in its floor (diam. 0.3 m) that was not well preserved. Two circular cupmarks (eastern—diam. 0.3 m, depth 0.36 m; western—diam. 0.25 m, depth 0.3 m) were hewn on either side of the treading floor at a distance of 0.75 m from its bottom, closest to the collecting vat. Additional depressions (diam. 0.22 m, depth 0.14 m) were hewn outside of the northeastern corner of the treading floor. Each of these depressions had a small recess at their bottom. Two channels (diam. 0.15 m) drained the must from the treading floor into the collecting vat. Four small rock-hewn cupmarks, which were discerned in the top southern part of the treading floor, appeared to be aligned together and traversed the back of both Winepresses XII and XIII.
Winepress XIII
 A rock-hewn winepress that consisted of an elongated shallow trapezoid treading floor with rounded corners (length 4.5 m, width 1.60–2.88 m, depth 0.10–0.15 cm) and a small rectangular collecting vat (0.65 × 1.40 m, depth 0.35 m), in the center of whose floor was a circular sump (diam. 0.3 m, depth 0.1 m). Two channels (diam. 0.16 m) drained the must from the treading floor into the collecting vat.
The back part of the treading floor was very shallow and had no well-defined upper (southern) corners. Its southeastern corner was turned toward the back of Winepress XII, which accordingly, was hewn first and Winepress XIII was installed either directly after or at a later date, possibly to an increase in demand.